NYC SIFT and the High School Search: What Data Can (and Can’t) Do

By Audrey and Abigail

We are self-proclaimed and unapologetic data nerds. When NYC SIFT was launched by a disgruntled, software-savvy 8th grade parent in 2023, it felt like an answer to our prayers: a New York City public high school directory with all the data in one place. Sure, the PI-level detective work of navigating endless dropdowns and DOE spreadsheets had its charm, but SIFT challenges us to do our jobs better. It frees up time from data hunting so we can focus on what matters—touring schools, talking to students, connecting with administrators, and yes, even waiting on hold with the DOE. Most importantly, it gives us more time to do the real work: helping families move from overwhelmed and unsure to grounded, informed, and even excited about what lies ahead.

Selecting a school for your child is a human process. Data has its place, but it doesn’t tell a school’s story. SIFT can show you AP offerings or four-year college rates, but it can’t capture the teachers who change teens’ lives or the vibe of post-school park hangs. It can generate a list based on filters, but it can’t ask follow-up questions or explain what “culinary arts” actually looks like.

We use NYC-SIFT. We want you to use NYC-SIFT. Just use it wisely – as one tool within a very human process.

What NYC-SIFT Gets Right:

NYC SIFT pulls from MySchools, School Quality Reports, school websites, and even FOIL requests. It is very, very good at data. And with nearly 1,000 NYC public high school programs, you need a place to start. SIFT helps you narrow the field, by distance, size, and other “must-haves,” and generates a workable list.

Of course, it won’t include that one perfect-fit program just outside your radius, or flag a lesser-known honors track you can place into sophomore year, but it’s a starting point – and a good one at that. 

Our Favorite Feature: Offer Prediction

We are huge proponents of getting ahead of the high school search. Building a long list early helps families avoid the fall scramble and instead focus on school fit. The challenge? You need your lottery number and screened group to assess your chances, and those don’t arrive until October, just two months before applications are due.

Before SIFT, families relied on applicant-to-seat ratios in MySchools – numbers that often raise more questions than answers. Brooklyn Millenium may have 2,000 applicants for 127 seats, but how many were in your screened group? SIFT’s prediction tool lets you model scenarios using lottery numbers and screened groups to estimate likelihood of admission. It’s not perfect, and data can shift year to year, but it offers meaningful transparency that supports planning early. 

Where NYC-SIFT Falls Short

NYC SIFT can support parts of the process, but it cannot guide you through it. It can’t quiet your worries, offer perspective, or ask the right questions to help you make sense of what actually matters for your child. 

In fact, in our experience, SIFT can sometimes add to the noise. Without context, data can push families to fixate on metrics, like college outcome and  AP counts, and hyper-compare school’s specific data points in ways that don’t meaningfully impact daily experience or students’ academic success. We make important life decisions all the time without SIFT-levels of data! More information is not always more clarity.

Adding Context: Academic Score 

In SIFT, schools default to being ranked by an “academic score,” a percentage based on metrics like test scores, grades, and four-year college placement. It’s an easy shorthand, and often becomes a primary filter for families. Attempts to rank NYC public high schools are frequently flawed, buoying well known options, without highlighting lesser known, high quality ones, and this is no exception.

In the case of SIFT’s academic score, you’ll see familiar names at the top – Stuyvesant, Brooklyn Tech, Eleanor Roosevelt – along with other selective programs.The 30 programs with the highest academic scores all share one trait: they admit students based on additional criteria like test scores, essays, or grades. In other words, they’re selecting for students who already perform well on the metrics used to calculate the score. I am no data expert, but seems like a potential case of correlation and not causation. Meanwhile, schools whose admissions methods yield academic diversity – even beloved programs like Essex Street or University Neighborhood – can appear weaker on paper, despite being deeply supportive, engaging environments filled with motivated students.

The Bottom Line: Human > Data

We believe in free, accessible, resources that support families through the NYC High School application process. SIFT is just that, a powerful resource. But your high school search won’t come from data alone. It comes from conversations – conversations with school experts, with current students, and with families who have gone through it all before. It comes from staying open-minded and curious. From touring. From understanding your child beyond their academic performance, and reflecting on the environments in which they thrive. 

And, of course, if you’re looking for support making sense of all the data and noise, we’re here to help streamline that research process. Come with your SIFT-filtered list, or with no research at all. We will share stories, ask the right follow-up questions, provide context, and even have some fun along the way. Like we said, selecting a school for your child is a human process.